Legal Opinion
Introna v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 3, 1995No. 1:93-cv-02870PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORAND UM-DE CISION AND ORDER
BARTELS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to New York State’s Comprehensive Motor Vehicle Insurance Reparations Act, Insurance Law § 5101, et seq. (McKinney’s 1985 & Supp.1995), and the regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively the “No-Fault Law”). Plaintiff Mario Introna, D.C. (“Dr. Introna”), a licensed chiropractor, seeks to recover from defendant Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) the cost of certain medical services he provided to patients covered by no-fault insurance policies issued by defendant. Plaintiffs also seek costs,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Allstate Ins. Co.(stolarz-Njm)New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & StolarzNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Arvatz v. Empire Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Maxwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Introna v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ABC Medical Management, Inc. v. GEICO General InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
- Robert Physical Therapy, P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2006