Legal Opinion
In Re Morgan Stanley Derivative Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 27, 2008No. 05 Civ. 6516(LTS)(RLE)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Central Laborers’ Pension Fund, Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Betty Fliedner, Sonia Luce-no, and James F. Groen (“Plaintiffs”), who assert that they were holders of Morgan Stanley stock at all relevant times, bring this derivative action on behalf of Morgan Stanley against former and current officers and directors of Morgan Stanley (“Defendants”), alleging violations of Sections 14(a) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and asserting various state common law claims including breaches of fiduciary duty, gross…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sherman v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- In Re American International Group, Inc. Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In re Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. HesseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. LundgrenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.