Threshermens Mutual Insurance v. Page
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJanine P. Geske, J.
¶ 1. We are faced with one question in this review: Whether the Worker's Compensation Act permits a worker's compensation insurer to assert a claim for an injured worker's pain and suffering in an action against a third party, when the employee has specifically declined to participate in the action? The court of appeals reversed a circuit court order barring the compensation insurer from presenting evidence of the injured worker's pain and suffering.1 We conclude that the Worker's Compensation Act, specifically Wis. Stat. § 102.29(1) (1993-94),2 *456does not prohibit a worker's compensation…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Heifetz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Kottka v. PPG Industries, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Hagen v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Martinez v. Ashland Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- Berna-Mork v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Russell Adams v. Northland Equipment Company, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Dalka v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. KeltgenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Secura Insurance v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.