Legal Opinion

Di Salvo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1924No. 6545PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error was convicted on three counts of an indictment charging him with violations of the Anti-Narcotic Act, 38 Stat. 785 as amended (Comp. St. §§ 6287g-6287q).

The first count appears to have been drawn under Section 8 of the Act, which provides:

“It shall be unlawful for any person not registered under the provisions of this' Act, and who has not paid the special tax provided for by this Act, to have in his possession or under his control any of the aforesaid drugs; and such possession or control shall be presumptive evidence of a violation of this section,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  3. United States v. Wong SingSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  2. Lamento v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Rossi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. United States v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Polski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API