Legal Opinion

Medical Inc. v. Angicor Ltd.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 18, 1988No. 3-85 CIV 625PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALSOP, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the undersigned upon defendant Raster’s motion to dismiss and defendant Angicor’s motion to dismiss, or alternatively for summary judgment. 1 Although the motions were submitted to the court at different times, the court will address both motions in this order because the motions involve common issues of law and fact.

I. BACKGROUND.

Because the respective motions are essentially motions to dismiss, all allegations in the amended complaint are assumed to be true and the motions should be denied unless “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
  2. Marine Iron & Shipbuilding Co. v. City of Duluth (In Re Marine Iron & Shipbuilding Co.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  3. Raymark Industries, Inc. v. StempleDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1988
  4. United States v. FerraraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  5. Lochhead v. AlacanoDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API