Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramos-Gonzalez

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 9, 2011No. 10-1318PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Cruz Roberto Ramos-González (“Ramos”) appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute in excess of 500 grams of cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B). Among other claims of error, Ramos contends that his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was violated when the district court allowed a forensic chemist to testify regarding the results of a drug analysis that he did not conduct. Recent Confrontation Clause jurisprudence compels us to agree. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate the conviction and remand for a new…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. United States v. James Earl PaivaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. Katherine Lea StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. United States v. Ramos-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. State of Tennessee v. Thomas Lee HutchisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. LopezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API