Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re D.W.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 2011No. 08-FS-761Published

1DissentThompson, Associate Judge

For several reasons, which I list below, I have found resolution of this appeal considerably more difficult than my colleagues have. In light of all the points that I discuss below, and with all due deference, I find myself unable to join in affirming the judgment of the trial court.

1. As Judge Schwelb’s opinion recounts, during the government’s case in chief, Donald Berry1 testified, “I have not took [sic] a blood test, so I’m not positive that I’m the father, but, yes, I’m considered the father” of both D.W. and D.S. Perhaps on a different record, Mr. Berry’s testimony could be read to mean…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. In re J.D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Lusby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API