Legal Opinion

Czapski v. Maher

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 2008No. 1—07—2137, 1—07—2207, 1—07—2266 consPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE ROBERT E. GORDON

delivered the opinion of the court:

This consolidated appeal arises from a trial court’s finding of no coverage under two insurance policies issued to an automobile dealership. The major issue presented before the trial court was whether a test-driver of a motor vehicle owned by an automobile dealership was a “customer” of that dealership for purposes of an exclusionary clause, excluding “customers” from coverage, under an automobile liability insurance policy. The trial court found in favor of National Casualty Company (National) and Federal Insurance Company…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Murphy v. UrsoIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Howlett v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Beckman v. Freeman United Coal Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Brotherhood Mutual Insurance v. RosethAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Czapski v. MaherAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Gregory v. Farmers Auto. Ins. Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Continental Cas. v. HOFFMAN AND ASSOCIATESAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Continental Casualty Company v. Howard Hoffman and AssociatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. Czapski v. MaherAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API