Legal Opinion

Davis v. Gaona

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 27, 1990No. S90A1108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Chief Justice.

Appellant-plaintiff in an action which was referred to arbitration pursuant to Fulton Superior Court Local Rule 1000 filed a motion for injunctive relief and to have the rule declared unconstitutional. The trial court denied relief and this appeal is from that order. We affirm.

Rule 1000 provides that civil actions seeking primarily money damages up to $25,000 or in an unspecified amount will be referred to compulsory but non-binding arbitration by a panel of three arbitrators randomly selected. Cases involving medical malpractice are excluded from arbitration. A party…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DeLamar v. DollarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Raintree Farms, Inc. v. Stripping Center, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Sellers v. Home Furnishing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  4. Davis v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  5. Tippins v. Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Focus Healthcare Medical Center, Inc. v. O’nealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Harvey v. SullivanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. Ekereke v. ObongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  4. Obong v. EkerekeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API