Legal Opinion

Bank of Oglethorpe v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 13, 1924No. 15473PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Peaches when sold on cash sale by the producer are within the contemplation of section 4126 of the Civil Code, providing that certain specified products, “or other product sold by planters . . on cash sale, shall not be considered as the property of the buyer until fully paid for, although it may have been delivered to the buyer.”

2. Where three planters sold to another on cash sale, in separate transactions, peaches which each had severally produced, and for which each was given a cheek for the amount due him, and all of the checks were subsequently dishonored, and where none of the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. American Trust & Banking Co. v. BooneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. American Nat. Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. First National Bank v. Charles Nelson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1868
  4. Bates-Farley Savings Bank v. DismukesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Rhodes & Son Furniture Co. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brightwell v. Oglethorpe Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Dell v. KugelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Broyles v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Reardon v. BlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Jasper School District v. GormleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API