Legal Opinion
Buchanan v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided December 6, 2005No. 04-P-990PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatzmann, J.
In this administrative appeal, brought pursuant to G. L. c. 30A, Carole Buchanan contests the decision of the Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (CRAB) that she does not qualify for superannuation retirement. Buchanan claims that CRAB improperly failed to credit her under G. L. c. 32, § 14, for time earned as a result of a lump sum settlement agreement in her worker’s compensation proceedings. G. L. c. 152, § 48. We affirm CRAB’s decision.
*245Facts. CRAB found the following facts. Buchanan worked as a service coordinator for the Department of Mental Retardation (DMR) from May, 1987, to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Flint v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Raytheon Co. v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Lisbon v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Cady v. MarcellaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Siebe, Inc. v. Louis M. Gerson Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Eastern Holding Corp. v. Congress Financial Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Brown-Forman Corp. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Frishman v. MaginnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Bailey v. Astra Tech, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.