Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Memorial Medical Center

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1997No. 23704PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCHINI, Chief Justice.

1. In this case we are asked again to address the question whether a public hospital, which files a lien under NMSA 1978, §§ 48-8-1 to-7 (1961, as amended 1995) (the Hospital Lien Act), is hable for attorney fees and costs incurred by a patient in pursuing personal injury claims. We recently held that a public hospital will not be liable for fees and costs. Eaton, Martinez & Hart, P.C. v. University of New Mexico Hosp., 1997 NMSC 015, 123 N.M. 76, 934 P.2d 270. We take this opportunity to affirm and expand our holding in Eaton, to address somewhat different…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Camino Real Mobile Home Park Partnership v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Regents of University of NM v. LaceyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Eaton, Martinez & Hart, P.C. v. University of New Mexico HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Regents of the University v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompaniesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Credit Institute v. Veterinary Nutrition Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Paz v. TijerinaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Pedroza v. Lomas Auto Mall, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
  5. Ashley Imming v. Osvaldo De La Vega, Mesilla Capital Investments, LLC, Southwest Health Services, P.A., and Mesilla Capital Investments de Mexico, S. de R.I.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API