Gould v. City of Hartford
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlue, J.
This slip and fall case raises an important question involving the ability of a municipal ordinance of general application to impose a duty upon the state. The state commissioner of transportation, J. William Burns (commissioner), contends that he had no duty to keep a sidewalk abutting state property free of ice and snow in spite of a municipal ordinance that on its face imposes such a duty upon all abutting landowners and that he is consequently protected by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. For the reasons set forth below, his motion to dismiss must be granted.
The complaint consists of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hewison v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beth A. Madden v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Beth A. Madden v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Beth A. Madden v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Levine v. Baking Company, No. Cv98 035 01 94 (Jun. 19, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Rodriguez v. Melekey, No. 97 0342710 (Jul. 22, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998