Legal Opinion

Poppenga v. Cramer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1977No. 11807PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINANS, Justice.1

The issue presented to this court is whether there is a genuine issue as to failure of consideration to support a promissory note. The trial court concluded that there was no genuine issue of material fact and found plaintiff liable on the note as a matter of law. We find that this is not a proper matter for summary judgment; the order granting summary judgment must be reversed and the matter remanded for trial.

On a motion for summary judgment the movant has the burden of showing clearly that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dusek v. ReeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. American State Bank v. CwachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. First Security Bank, Morristown v. SkjoldalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Giddens v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Belfield v. BurichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wm. Collins, Inc. v. South Dakota State Board of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Brown County Cooperative Ass'n v. Rasmussen-King Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Brown County Cooperative Ass'n v. Rasmussen-King Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Poppenga v. CramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API