Poppenga v. Cramer
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
250 N.W.2d 278 (1977)
Sanford A. POPPENGA, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Keith D. CRAMER, Defendant and Respondent.
No. 11807.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
February 10, 1977.
Rehearing Denied March 18, 1977.
Phillip O. Peterson, of Frieberg & Frieberg, Beresford, for plaintiff and appellant.
Milton Buechler, Lennox, Gary L. Richter, of Zimmer, Richter & Duncan, Parker, for defendant and respondent.
WINANS, Justice.[1]
The issue presented to this court is whether there is a genuine issue as to failure of consideration to support a promissory note. The trial court concluded that there was no genuine issue…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Dusek v. ReeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- American State Bank v. CwachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- First Security Bank, Morristown v. SkjoldalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Poppenga v. CramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.