Legal Opinion

Poppenga v. Cramer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1977No. 11807Published

1Opinion of the Court

250 N.W.2d 278 (1977)

Sanford A. POPPENGA, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Keith D. CRAMER, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 11807.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

February 10, 1977.

Rehearing Denied March 18, 1977.

Phillip O. Peterson, of Frieberg & Frieberg, Beresford, for plaintiff and appellant.

Milton Buechler, Lennox, Gary L. Richter, of Zimmer, Richter & Duncan, Parker, for defendant and respondent.

WINANS, Justice.[1]

The issue presented to this court is whether there is a genuine issue as to failure of consideration to support a promissory note. The trial court concluded that there was no genuine issue…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dusek v. ReeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. American State Bank v. CwachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. First Security Bank, Morristown v. SkjoldalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Poppenga v. CramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API