Legal Opinion

Herreshoff v. Boutineau

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 14, 1890PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Bill in Equity for an injunction. On demurrer to the bill.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, J.

The complainant, director of a school of languages in Providence, employed the respondent to teach French from January 7, 1889, to July 1, 1889. The contract, in writing, provided that the respondent would not, during the year after the end of his service, “ teach the French or German language or any part thereof, nor aid to teach them, nor advertise to teach them, nor be in any way connected with any person or persons or institutions that teach them in the said State of Rhode Island.” The respondent’s service ended July 1, 1889; after which time he gave lessons in French in Providence. This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  2. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Samuel Stores, Inc. v. AbramsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  4. Harrison v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  5. Love v. Miami Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API