Legal Opinion
People v. Scott
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1972No. Crim. 19376PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Defendant was charged by information with two counts of selling marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11531) and one count of selling benzedrine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11912). He pleaded not guilty. A jury found him guilty on each count. Proceedings were suspended, and defendant was placed on three years’ probation on various terms and conditions. He appeals from the judgment (order granting probation).
Defendant’s trial commenced May 6, 1969. All evidence was presented, and the cause was argued on that date. The jurors were instructed and rendered their verdict the following day.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. Steven B.California Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. ApalatequiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Forbes v. David T.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- People v. MalabagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.