Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 26, 1981No. [No. 95, September Term, 1980.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

We granted review in this case to decide whether appellant was effectively denied his right of appeal because portions of two state’s witnesses’ testimony were not preserved due to technical problems with the trial court’s tape recording system. The appellant, Jack James Smith, was convicted of first degree murder and two related handgun offenses in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. The Court of Special Appeals thereafter affirmed his conviction in an unreported per curiam opinion, Jack James Smith v. State of Maryland, No. 1603, September Term, 1979, filed July 18, 1980, which held…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. State v. IbarraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Bradley v. Hazard Technology Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API