Legal Opinion
Tur v. Youtube Inc
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 21, 2009No. 07-56683Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT TUR, doing business as Los Angeles News Service, No. 07-56683 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. CV-06-04436-FMC YOUTUBE, INC., OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Florence-Marie Cooper, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted March 5, 2009—Pasadena, California Filed April 21, 2009 Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion 4647 TUR v. YOUTUBE, INC. 4649 COUNSEL…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. William G. Gordon, and State of Oregon, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Jones-Hamilton Co., a California Corporation v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc. Kop-Coat, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Navellier v. SlettenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.