Hamilton Corp. v. Alexander
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan
In Rosewood Corporation v. Fisher, 46 Ill.2d 249, this court concluded that consolidation in that case of certain appeals was improvident and did not decide, but held under advisement a number of cases which involved issues relating to the construction and validity of the appeal and bond provisions of the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 57, pars. 19 and 20). We now consider those cases.
As in Rosewood, the defendants herein purposely defaulted on their contracts for purchase of residence property, and the plaintiffs, the sellers of the property, obtained judgments…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jack Spring, Inc. v. LittleIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- Stein v. HowlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- Rosewood Corp. v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Thorpe v. MahinIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Anderson v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Kobylanski v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- County of Bureau v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Happel v. MecklenburgerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.