Legal Opinion

Dahl v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2013No. Nos. 20120209, 20120211PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Darin Dahl appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Dahl argues his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a bifurcated trial under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-04.1-16 and for failing to request the verdict form reflect the possibility of a finding of “not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility.” We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In 2008, Dahl was the suspect of a police standoff in a rural Steele County residence. Dahl shot at police officers during the standoff, and he was subsequently charged with reckless…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Flanagan v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Noorlun v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Osier v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Rencountre v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Dahl v. DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API