Legal Opinion

Patton v. Nicholson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 19, 1818PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

16 U.S. 96 (____)

3 Wheat. 96

PATTON

v.

NICHOLSON.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 19th, 1818. Swann, for the plaintiff.

*MARSHALL, Ch. J., delivered the opinion of the court.

That the [*207 use of a license or pass from the enemy, by a citizen, being unlawful, one citizen had no right to purchase of, or sell to, another, such a license or pass, to be used on board an American vessel.

Judgment affirmed.[(a)]

NOTES

[(a)] In the several cases, during the late war, of The Julia, 8 Cranch 181; The Aurora, Id. 203; The Hiram, Id. 444; s.c. 1 Wheat. 440, and The Ariadne, 2 Id. 143, the court determined,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The HiramSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  2. The Julia, Luce, MasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  3. Nathaniel L. v. WaddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1818

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. (PC) Dailey v. Solano County SheriffDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. (PC) Perez v. BeckDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. (PS) Bernhard v. County of San JoaquinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Estrada v. Midland Credit Management IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  5. Ochoa v. Von LintigDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API