Legal Opinion

The Hiram

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 22, 1816PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appear from the circuit ccnirt for the district of Massachusetts. This Was a vessel laden with flour, and bound from Baltimore, to Lisbon, captured, and finally condemned by this court at February term, 2814, for sailing under a license from the enemy. The present case was that-of the claimants of a greater part of the cargo.

Read the full summary

Appear from the circuit ccnirt for the district of Massachusetts. This Was a vessel laden with flour, and bound from Baltimore, to Lisbon, captured, and finally condemned by this court at February term, 2814, for sailing under a license from the enemy. The present case was that-of the claimants of a greater part of the cargo. The .ship was owned, and the license procured, by Samuel G. Griffith, a citizen of the United States, Separate bills, of lading were at first signed by the master, one for each shipper, and separate letters of instruction were given to Palterson Hartshorne, the…

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

When the claimants, in this case, applied to the circuit court to be let in to farther proof, for the purpose of showing their ignorance of the fact that the Hiram sailed under the protection of a British license, the judge of that court considered the agreement of the parties that these causes should depend on the fate of Griffith's claim, under which agreement the sentence, that would otherwise have been pronounced against them, was suspended until the decision ol the supreme court on that claim should, be made, as having the same validity…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Gamewell Manufacturing, Inc., a Corporation v. Hvac Supply, Inc., and Aeronca, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. Walden v. SkinnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Barry v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Brast v. Winding Gulf Colliery Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API