Legal Opinion

Gray v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided January 16, 1997No. 3:94-0712, 3:95-0616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ECHOLS, District Judge.

Presently pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, to which Plaintiff has filed a Response. For the reasons discussed herein, Defendant’s Motion is hereby GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART.

Plaintiff brought this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000h-6, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Tennessee Human Rights Act (“THRA”), Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 4-21-101 to 903, and Tennessee common law, alleging that Defendant discriminated against her on the basis of sex when it terminated her, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Torrez v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of DelawareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Williamson v. Hartmann Luggage Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API