Legal Opinion

Helphenstine v. Vincennes National Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Erom the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this action, the appellant, as plaintiff, sued the appellees, as defendants, in a complaint of a single paragraph. To this complaint, the appellee, the Vincennes National Bank, separately demurred upon the following grounds of objection :

1. That the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ;

2. Eor a defect of parties plaintiffs, in this, that the appellees John J. McLaughlin and Howard A. Trendley ought to have been, but were not, parties plaintiffs.

The appellees McLaughlin and Trendley demurred t<o appellant’s complaint, for the alleged insufficiency of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swift v. TouseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Porter v. HollowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Kohler v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Craft v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hume v. ConduittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Pickering v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Laverty v. State ex rel. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Benson v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API