Legal Opinion

United States v. Glück & Sons

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 11, 1917No. 1684PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7842 (T. D. 36079,). [Oral argument, May 16,1916, by Mr. Ilanson and Mr. washburn; reargument Oct. 13, 1916, by Mr. Hanson and Mr. Lawrence and Mr. washburn.]

1Opinion of the Court

MoNtgomery, Presiding Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

• This case came on to be beard at tbe April term, 1916. After consideration of tbe case as presented a reargument was directed and among tbe questions suggested was whether the articles involved should be assessed as entireties or segregated into tbe constituent articles which went to make up the cases as they appeared upon entry.

The case having been reheard and both parties having agreed that the articles should he considered as entireties, we shall proceed to ■consider the case on its merits, treating this assumption as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hensel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. United States v. Mark Cross Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. Von OefeleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Horstmann Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Andrews & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. Kresge Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  4. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  5. C & M Srery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API