Brice-Nash v. Barton Salt Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Reno district court; Peter J. Galle,. judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mason, J.:
C. Brice-Nash sued the Barton Salt Company for damages on account of injuries received while in its employ. A demurrer to his evidence was sustained, and he prosecutes error. The evidence tended to establish these, facts:
The defendant is engaged in manufacturing, refining- and selling salt. The plaintiff was its bookkeeper. His. duties required him at times, for the purpose of procuring information, to go into the packing-room, which, was partly filled with salt, which rose nearly perpendicularly to the height of about twelve feet. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donk Bros. Coal & Coke Co. v. ThilIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co. v. ShanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Belleville Stone Co. v. MooneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
- Belleville Stone Co. v. MooneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
- McLaine v. Head & Dowst Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Cheek v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Carillo v. United States Construction & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Lunn v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Maness v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.