Legal Opinion

Brice-Nash v. Barton Salt Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1908No. 15,711PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Reno district court; Peter J. Galle,. judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

C. Brice-Nash sued the Barton Salt Company for damages on account of injuries received while in its employ. A demurrer to his evidence was sustained, and he prosecutes error. The evidence tended to establish these, facts:

The defendant is engaged in manufacturing, refining- and selling salt. The plaintiff was its bookkeeper. His. duties required him at times, for the purpose of procuring information, to go into the packing-room, which, was partly filled with salt, which rose nearly perpendicularly to the height of about twelve feet. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donk Bros. Coal & Coke Co. v. ThilIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co. v. ShanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Belleville Stone Co. v. MooneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  4. Belleville Stone Co. v. MooneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  5. McLaine v. Head & Dowst Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Cheek v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Carillo v. United States Construction & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Lunn v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Maness v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API