Jones v. Fischer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Initially, we are not persuaded by petitioner’s procedural complaints. The record reflects that the Hearing Officer conducted a fair and impartial hearing and made appropriate evidentiary determinations (see Matter of Dennis v Bezio, 82 AD3d 1398, 1399 [2011]; Matter of Sepe v Goord, 1 AD3d 667, 668 [2003]). The record also reflects that the hearing was conducted within the time frames permitted by appropriate extensions (see Matter of McNeil v Fischer, 95 AD3d 1520, 1521 [2012]; Matter of Martinez v Fischer, 82 AD3d 1380, 1381 [2011]). Furthermore, we are satisfied on this record that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNeil v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Davis v. PrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Dennis v. BezioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Martinez v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Sepe v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gren v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Alicea v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Thompson v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Alicea v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Gren v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.