Legal Opinion
United States v. Manalo
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided July 16, 1976No. 31,766PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Pursuant to Article 67(b)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867(b), the Judge Advocate General of the Navy has certified two questions regarding the Court of Military Review’s interpretation of the 90-day speedy review standard announced in Dunlap v. Convening Authority, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 135, 48 C.M.R. 751 (1974).1 The first concerns whether, in computing the number of days for application of the Dunlap rule, the Navy court erred in counting both the first day of post-trial confinement and the day on which the convening authority promulgated his action…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Sheets v. Selden's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Taylor v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Fogel v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. LarsenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. MurrayU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1975
4Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. NewU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. CherokU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. MillerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. LeonardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. BaughcumU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.