Legal Opinion
In Re McMillian's Eligibility for Conditional Admission to the Practice of Law
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 2005No. 32267PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The Opinion of the Court was delivered PER CURIAM.
Justice DAVIS, deeming herself disqualified, did not participate in the decision of this case.
Justice MAYNARD, deeming himself disqualified, did not participate in the decision of this case.
Judge JOHN R. FRAZIER, sitting by temporary assignment.
Judge JAY M. HOKE, sitting by temporary assignment.
Justice STARCHER concurs and will file a separate opinion.
2Per curiam
This matter is before the Court on the recommendation of the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners (the “Board”) that applicant Mark Lee McMillian be admitted to practice law in the State of West…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re ManvilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. KarlWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re ManvilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Lane v. W. Va. State Board of Law ExaminersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Matter of DortchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- In Re McMillian's Eligibility for Conditional Admission to the Practice of LawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005