Legal Opinion
Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer La County California State Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 14, 2003No. 01-56320Published
1Opinion of the Court
323 F.3d 748
Edmund Y. CHEIN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Richard SHUMSKY, Chief Probation Officer LA County; California State Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-56320.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 2, 2002.
Filed March 14, 2003.
Charles M. Sevilla, Cleary & Sevilla, San Diego, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.
Brentford Ferriera (brief) and Matthew G. Monforton, Deputy District Attorneys, Los Angeles, CA, for the real party in interest, State of California.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Audrey…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.