State v. Gonzales
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
May a person charged under the first degree escape statute, RCW 9A.76.110(1), challenge the constitutional validity of the convictions which led to confinement? We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals and hold that in a prosecution for escape the State is not required to prove the defendant had been detained pursuant to a constitutionally valid conviction.
I
On Saturday, April 3, 1982, Robert B. Gonzales was detained at the Tri-State Work Release Facility pursuant to prior burglary convictions. At about 6:45 that morning, Gonzales signed out of the facility, telling the authorities that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HolsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DanforthWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. SwindellWashington Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- State v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.