Legal Opinion

State v. Downing

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 15, 2004No. 28995-4-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, C.J.

Following a stipulated facts bench trial, Robert Downing, Jr., was convicted of bail jumping based on his failure to appear for arraignment on charges of unlawful issuance of bank checks (UIBC). Downing appeals the bail jumping conviction, arguing that double jeopardy and the mandatory joinder rule rendered the underlying UIBC charges invalid at the time of the missed court appearance. He also claims ineffective assistance based on his counsel’s failure to raise mandatory joinder. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

Downing passed a series of bad checks in March and April of 2001. In December 2001…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. BergstromWashington Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State Of Washington v. Cyrus N. Plush, IiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API