Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Baum

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.

Securely written into our law, and firmly intrenched as a sound civil principle, is the,right of employees to organize as a union for the purposes of protection and the conservation of the rights of the employed against possible aggression by the employer. In furtherance of this prerogative, when dispute arises between employer and employee, the union may, to invite support of the public and present its side of the case, indulge in what is known as picketing, a means adopted to tangibly and forcibly make known the existence of a controversy. But this right must be exercised in the manner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Traub Amusement Co. v. MackerNew York Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steiner v. Long Beach Local No. 128California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Aberon Bakery Co. v. RaimistNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hammer v. BaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  4. Steiner v. Long Beach Local No. 128California Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Steiner v. Long Beach Local No. 128California Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API