Legal Opinion
Tamburrino v. Sterrick Delivery Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 18, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.
We think, upon the evidence, the infant plaintiff, a boy six years of age at the time of the accident, was entitled to recover a judgment for damages against the defendants, and that the verdict directed in favor of the defendants was erroneous, contrary to the evidence, and against the clear weight of the evidence.
The infant plaintiff, a boy six years of age, on June 5, 1931, was riding upon a contrivance known as a “ scooter,” on One Hundred and Fifteenth street between Third and Lexington avenues in the borough of Manhattan. There was located on the street, within a few feet westerly of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Lieberman v. . VandecarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Cherubino v. MeenanNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Castro v. New York Railways Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Callahan v. Terminal Cab Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- Angueira v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Schwartzberg v. WallanderNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. WeisbergerNew York Court of Special Session · 1939