Legal Opinion
Andersen v. Bishop
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 28, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The plaintiff appealed from the orders of the Superior Court sustaining the several demurrers of the defendants to the plaintiff’s declaration, which is in three counts. The gist of the first two counts of the declaration is that the defendants “conspired maliciously and, or, corruptly to nol pross” certain indictments and “to prpvent the plaintiff from recovering for his damage and losses sustained thru the false testimony” given by one Wyman, and “under pressure” of the defendants named in the indictments alleged to have been “nol press’d” and “That in nol pross’ing the indictments the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Stiles v. Municipal CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Allard v. EstesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Caverno v. FellowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Jaffarian v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Gildea v. EllershawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Breault v. CHAIRMAN OF BD, FIRE COMMR. OF SPRINGFIELDMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Chicopee Lions Club v. DIST. ATTORNEY FOR HAMPDEN DISTMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Miller v. City of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.