Legal Opinion

Oxygenator Water Technologies, Inc. v. Tennant Company

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 7, 2020No. 0:20-cv-00358Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Oxygenator Water Technologies, Inc., File No. 20-cv-358 (ECT/HB) Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER Tennant Company Defendant. Aaron W. Pederson, J. Derek Vandenburgh, Nathan Louwagie and Philip P. Caspers, Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff Oxygenator Water Technologies, Inc. Cara S. Donels and Robert Scott Johnson, Fredrikson & Byron, PA, Des Moines, IA and Lora Mitchell Friedemann, Fredrikson & Byron PA, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant Tennant Company. Plaintiff Oxygenator Water Technologies, a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API