Legal Opinion
Lean v. Geagan
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1912No. Civ. No. 1099PublishedCited by 10 opinions
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County granting a new trial. N. D. Arnot, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This isan appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion for a new trial, after judgment for plaintiff in an action on an agreement of guaranty had been rendered and entered.
On the twenty-fourth day of April, 1908, the defendant Lottie P. Geagan made, executed, and delivered to the Hitchcock-Hill Company, a corporation, a guaranty in the words and figures following:
“Guaranty.
“I hereby request Hitchcock-Hill Company, a corporation, to sell and deliver to W. B. Provan, Colo., County Denver, merchandise as he may from time to time require, and in consideration of such sale and credit extended…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Crittenden v. FiskeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Sturges v. RobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
- Schinasi v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Fisk v. StoneSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Tiffany v. Pacific Sewer Pipe Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Cathay Bank v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Berg Metals Corp. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.