People v. Tinsley

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of assault with intent to murder, MCLA 750.83; MSA 28.278. Upon review of the issues raised on appeal we affirm.

Defendant asserts upon appeal that the trial court erred in allowing a prosecution witness to refuse to answer certain questions on cross-examination because of the privilege against self-incrimination. A review of the record, consisting of 41 pages of thorough cross-examination of the witness, indicates that the questions to which answers were refused were such as to implicate the witness in crimes other than the one at issue. A witness when he…