Legal Opinion

People v. Herbert Smith

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1971No. Docket 7622PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of unarmed robbery, MCLA § 750.530 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.798).

Defendant first contends that the trial court was without jurisdiction because the trial was not commenced within 180 days after defendant was committed to prison on another charge. MCLA § 780-.131 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.969[1]) provides :

“Whenever the department of corrections shall receive notice that there is pending in this state any untried warrant, indictment, information or complaint setting forth against any inmate of a penal institution of this state a criminal offense for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HendershotMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. National Biscuit Company v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Knox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. People v. ForrestMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Ellison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. State v. FossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. BellacchioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API