McMullen v. Person
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus.' Eelators applied for mandamus to compel respondent to* dissolve an injunction restraining the issue of certain, bonds. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The board of supervisors of the county of Cheboygan, desiring to submit to the'electors the question of the erection of a court-house, and the issue of bonds-' to obtain the necessary funds therefor, passed the following resolution by the requisite two-thirds vote:
“Resolved, that the board of supervisors of Cheboygan* county be authorized to borrow $35,000 upon the faith, and credit of the county of Cheboygan, and to issue the-bonds of said county, to be payable in 10 installments, within 30 years of the date of their issue, first installment-to be made payable 10 years from date of issue,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Attorney General ex rel. Sheley v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shearer v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Village of Wolverine v. Cheboygan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Attorney General ex rel. McRae v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Hartingh v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Board of Supervisors v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.