Legal Opinion

National Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 15, 1967No. Civ. A. 1911-66PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGOWAN, Circuit Judge: ■

Plaintiffs and intervening plaintiffs, who are associations of motor freight carriers and freight forwarders subject to regulation by the Interstate Commerce Commission, seek nullification of the Commission’s action in establishing an informal procedure for the restoration to shippers of past charges which are currently agreed by the carrier and shipper to have been illegal. Certain shippers’ associations have intervened as party defendants with the Commission and the United States. All parties have stipulated that we should dispose of the case without…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  4. T. I. M. E. Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. TI ME Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Richard A. Batterton, Secretary of Employment & Social Services of the State of Maryland v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Richard Pickus v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. Ignacio F. Lewis-Mota v. The Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1978

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API