Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Rousso

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 28, 2013No. Nos. SC11-15, SC11-16PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Respondent Mark Enrique Rousso and Respondent Leonardo Adrian Roth be found guilty of professional misconduct. The referee recommended sanctions of a twelve-month suspension for Rousso and a fifteen-month suspension for Roth. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. We approve the referee’s findings of fact. We approve the referee’s recommendations as to guilt, except we disapprove the referee’s recommendation that Respondents be found not guilty of violating Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 5-l.l(a)(l) (Trust Account Required;…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Jeremy W. AltersSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  2. Florida Bar v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Florida Bar v. WhitneySupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  4. The Florida Bar v. Randall Lawrence GilbertSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  5. The Florida Bar v. Alejandro L. MarriagaSupreme Court of Florida · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API