Legal Opinion

California School Employees Ass'n v. Los Angeles City Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1976No. Civ. 48166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, P. J.

Petitioner California School Employees Association (CSEA) and Dieter Nicklesberg, a classified employee of respondent Los Angeles City Unified School District of Los Angeles County (District) sought a writ of mandate compelling District:

1. To rescind and abolish rules 1990, 3008 and 4008, enacted by District, which permit certain employees designated as A and B to be placed on no more than five or two days of unpaid leaves of absence in their respective annual terms of employment; and

2. To set aside an order placing certain employees on unpaid leaves of absence, pursuant to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Klinker v. KlinkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cal. Sch. Emps. Ass'n v. Pasadena Unified Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Stoneham v. RushenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Bradshaw v. DuffyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API