Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Supreme Council American Legion of Honor

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is one of seventeen appeals from a decree of a single justice,* dated October 29, 1909, disallowing claims of the appellants offered by them for proof against the fund in the hands of the receiver in this case. The only fund in the hands of the receiver is the residue of the emergency fund of the defendant corporation. All these claims are for the difference between the amount originally named in the certificate and that already paid to the claimants. One payment has been made in each instance. In some instances $2,000 has been paid under by-law 55 (cutting down the amount of all…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Supreme Council of the Royal ArcanumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Harvey-Watts Co. v. Worcester Umbrella Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Rackemann v. Riverbank Improvement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. Newhall v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  5. Dean v. American Legion of HonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Tremont Trust Co. v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Forbes v. ThorpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Supreme Colony v. TowneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  5. Veazie v. StaplesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API