Legal Opinion

KA v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 2011No. 49A02-1103-CT-188PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Tat-Yik Jarvis Ka (“Jarvis”) and Amanda Beth Ka (“Amanda”) (collectively, “the Kas”) sued the City of Indianapolis (“the City”) for negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress, trespass, and nuisance after sewage from a City pipe backed up into their home. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the City on all of the Kas’ claims, and they now appeal, raising the single issue of whether the trial court erred by granting the City’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

On April 25, 2007, a City contractor…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. City of Gary Ex Rel. King v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Gray v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Groves v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  2. Alvarez v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  3. Hostetler v. Johnson Controls IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  4. Ortberg v. Goldman Sachs GroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. The 487 Broadway Company, LLC v. Kimberly K. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API