Legal Opinion

Hvamstad v. Suhler

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 5, 1990No. 90-5034MNPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant has challenged the constitutionality of Minnesota’s nuisance abatement law1 with respect to prostitution convictions. The statute defines a nuisance as, among other things,

*1219three or more misdemeanor convictions or two or more convictions, of which at least one is a gross misdemeanor or felony, within the previous two years for: (1) acts of prostitution or prostitution related offenses committed within the building. ...

Minn.Stat.Ann. § 617.81 (West Supp.1990). Other provisions of the statute provide for notice of convictions to the building owner, a temporary order of injunction,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Crowley Beverage Company, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Company, Crowley Beverage Company, Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  3. Hvamstad v. SuhlerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Hvamstad v. SuhlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API