Hvamstad v. Suhler
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant has challenged the constitutionality of Minnesota’s nuisance abatement law1 with respect to prostitution convictions. The statute defines a nuisance as, among other things,
*1219three or more misdemeanor convictions or two or more convictions, of which at least one is a gross misdemeanor or felony, within the previous two years for: (1) acts of prostitution or prostitution related offenses committed within the building. ...
Minn.Stat.Ann. § 617.81 (West Supp.1990). Other provisions of the statute provide for notice of convictions to the building owner, a temporary order of injunction,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crowley Beverage Company, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Company, Crowley Beverage Company, Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Hvamstad v. SuhlerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Hvamstad v. SuhlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990