Legal Opinion

United States v. Mississippi Vocational Rehabilitation for Blind

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided May 22, 1992No. Civ. A. S90-0494(R)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

DAN M. RUSSELL, Jr., District Judge.

This cause is before this Court on Motion of the defendant/counterclaimant Mississippi Vocational Rehabilitation for the Blind (hereinafter “MVRB”), for Summary Judgment on its counterclaim and to dismiss plaintiffs complaint, with exhibits, and on cross-motion of the plaintiff, the United States of America (hereinafter “USA”) and counterdefendants Roy S. Es- tess, Admiral Richard H. Truly, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (hereinafter collectively referred to as “NASA”) for summary judgment.

I. STATUTORY AND REGULATORY…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Election Commission v. Legi-Tech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Littleton v. Lanac Investments, LLC (In re Kudzu Marine, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2017
  3. State v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  4. United States v. Mississippi Vocational Rehabilitation for the BlindDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API