Legal Opinion

State v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 12, 2019No. 19-1022Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1022C (Filed: August 12, 2019) THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, et al., ) Application for a temporary restraining ) order; motion to dismiss for lack of Plaintiffs, ) subject matter jurisdiction; 28 U.S.C. § and ) 1500; the Randolph-Sheppard Act, 20 ) U.S.C. §§ 107-107f; requirements for a CANTU SERVICES, INC., ) temporary restraining order ) Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) ) and ) ) DAVID ALTSTATT, SR., ) ) Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant, ) and ) ) MITCHCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) ) Defendant-Intervenor. ) Peter A. Nolan, Winstead…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API