Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark Samuel Richardson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1988No. 87-5252PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Mark Samuel Richardson timely appeals from his conditional plea of guilty to one count of theft of government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. We affirm.

In April 1987, Detective Mumma of the Corona Police Department began to suspect that Richardson was involved in a service station burglary. Mumma knew that another detective was seeking an arrest warrant for Richardson regarding an older case in Riverside County. Mumma further discovered that Richardson was on parole in both Orange and Riverside counties.

Mumma contacted both of Richardson’s probation officers.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Clifford v. Latta v. C. J. FitzharrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. People v. BravoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. United States v. Stephen Jarrad, United States of America v. Charles McManamyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Sonnie Davis v. Kevin Davis, United States of America v. Kevin DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. People v. Tyrell J.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States v. David L. Harper, United States of America v. Adrian A. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. State v. BraxtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API